Lina Lamont

"What do you think I am, dumb or something?"

Hell hath no fury like a blogger scorned

The Social Network

Once again, a film that had me at the trailer – as brilliantly edited and soundtracked as the actual movie turned out to be.   This rendition of Radiohead’s “Creep” performed by the Vega choir’s haunting young voices establishes such pathos for the social trauma of college life – at Harvard University in particular – with its cliques and clubs and the desperation to fit in.  Mark Zuckerberg is a sartorially-challenged computer geek who just wants what anyone in college wants: to meet girls, and to create something significant.  It’s hilarious that the trigger for his ultimate brilliance is being dumped by a girl far more emotionally intelligent than he is, which sends him on a drunken programming all-nighter as he blogs pejoratively about his recent ex and comes up with facemash.com the ultimate revenge against all womankind that invites fellow students to rate the attractiveness of the girls in their class.  Having caused mayhem with the university IT system, alienated the female population and gained notoriety with the administrative board among others, Mark embarks on the creation of what is today the most significant, worldwide social networking system of our time.

Some people worried that a movie about Facebook might be boring, or worse, just lame.  After all, it’s not easy to translate something which is ostensibly about sitting at your computer for hours, in lieu of getting a life, into a cinematic experience.  The success of the film is in fact manifold.  We have a fast-paced script written by Aaron Sorkin (with all the spice and wit of “The West Wing”) which the actors deliver with aplomb.  There are excellent central performances from Jesse Eisenberg (extending his geek-boy repertoire from the wonderful Squid and the Whale and Zombieland), the newly appreciated Andrew Garfield, and even popstar Justin Timberlake (relishing his role as Sean Parker, creator of Napster).  Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails provides a blistering soundtrack.  And of course, hats off to David Fincher for once again creating a yellow-tinted masterpiece of social commentary (a la Fight Club), dramatic intrigue (as in Se7en), giving us a fictionalised account of a true story (like Zodiac) and performing CGI marvels with face-mashes of his own by producing a convincing pair of identical twins from one guy (after his experience on The Curious Case of Benjamin Button).

The film weaves between two strands of narrative: Zuckerberg’s court cases as he is sued for millions after Facebook takes off, and the backstory of how it all came to pass – and it’s a compelling account of how something that is common (and indispensable!) to so many of us came into being.  There are particular delights in seeing the conception of various aspects of the site, such as the Relationship Status and creation of the Wall.  The Harvard frat parties almost make one yearn for one’s university days (not that my experience bore any resemblance).  But at heart this is a human interest drama – ironically revolving around a central character who seldom seems human at all.

The real Mark Zuckerberg apparently thought it was “cool” that Jesse Eisenberg was playing him in the film, which may be taken as something of an endorsement.  But regardless of how much of the story is true, or whose performance might be written off as caricature, The Social Network is a total blast.  Just imagine if everyone whose heart got broken produced a $25 billion business as a result…

 

 

Advertisements

Single Post Navigation

One thought on “Hell hath no fury like a blogger scorned

  1. The most refreshing thing about The Social Network from the point of view of someone who works in the industry is that the depiction of computer technology and software is actually very accurate. This is almost never the case in a Hollywood film. There’s no references to “downlinking the firewall” or similar nonsense, and the “wget magic” Zuckerberg mentions in his initial programming binge is used exactly in the correct context. Not that we should be surprised given the screenwriter is the almost always wonderful Mr Sorkin.

    Sorkin’s dialogue is the highlight of the film, especially in the opening scene. Sad to say I have worked with a number of people similar to the Zuckerberg depicted in the film. Far from being brilliant, Zuckerberg is socially dysfunctional. The inability to empathise or put the wellbeing or feelings of others before their own may be helpful in building a successful internet venture, but the film is also a stark reminder of why we should be wary of allowing these same people to have too much control of the internet as a whole.

    But at the end of the day, the film succeeds because it’s really a human drama: Z’s rise to success at the expense of all of the few friendships he is able to scrape together.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: